← Exam Skills

Session 54

2026-09-27 · 2026-W39 ✓ reviewed

What happened

Technique read of the CS paper 1 placement (test #1, 2 h window, 52 marks, guide 90 min). Started 12:26 Sun 27 Sep, closed by Paige after 50 min — 70 of 120 min unused, 40 min under the 90-min guide. Order: Q1, Q7, Q8, Q10, Q14, Q16, Q17, Q6, Q15, Q19, Q2, Q12, Q13, Q18, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q4, Q5, Q11, Q3, Q9 — jumped around the paper, no flags. 0 typed blanks; Q12(2) 'i don't know', Q20(2) empty. Marks lost to technique rather than knowledge: Q18 0/3 — three correct test-data values with no 'what the program should do', a two-part instruction half answered; Q9 mark 3 — correct logic printed instead of stored in the named variable, and a premise ('age already holds a number') ignored; Q11 last mark — trace continued one pass after the condition was false. Time hog: none — Q9 ran 6 min on a 4-min guide and scored 2/3; every other question at or under its guide. No checking time: closed with 58% of the window unused and two sub-parts empty.

Planned next

Next paper: before Start, read one line aloud — 'when a question asks for two things, answer both; when it names a variable, use it'. Watch whether the trace table stops at the false condition, and whether she uses any of the leftover time to check.

What this session changed

TopicNameChangeEvidence recorded
R1Not started → Not startedCS paper 1, 27 Sep: Q9 'store in a variable called price' answered with print statements; Q18 'give a value and state what the program should do' answered with values only — 4 marks lost to reading the instruction, not to knowledge.
A5Not started → Not startedCS paper 1, 27 Sep: 22 questions, 0 typed blanks; 2 sub-parts empty (Q12b, Q20b), both on untaught content.
T4Not started → Not startedCS paper 1, 27 Sep: closed after 50 of 120 min, 40 min under the paper's own guide, with two sub-parts empty and no checking pass.
T2Not started → Not startedCS paper 1, 27 Sep: every question at or under its time guide except Q9 (6 min on 4); total 50 min against a 90-min guide — pace is not the problem on this paper.