Currently Developing · last touched 2026-10-22
| When | Change | Evidence | Session |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | Developing → Developing | 22 Oct: Blake as subject in 4 of 4 sentences that named a doer, incl. two in the unaided timed answer ('Blake uses the word', 'Blake blames'); 0 'they' for the poet. Second unaided task with the writer as subject (15 Oct chat sentences, 21 Oct paper Q6). Stays developing; K5 adjudication still owed. | session 131 |
| 2026-10-21 | Developing → Developing | paper #10 Q6: 3/4 (chat answer after close, portal blank) — 'the hapless Soldier's sigh' quoted inside her own sentence, recognisable, with a comment | session 126 |
| 2026-10-20 | Developing → Developing | Shakespeare as subject in 3 of 3 written sentences today, including the unaided exit ticket; no 'they' for the writer. Not yet checked across a different task. | session 118 |
| 2026-10-20 | Developing → Developing | 19 Oct: wrote 'Shakespeare makes...' as subject when given the starter 'Shakespeare makes the first prophecy come true quickly in order to'. Starter-prompted, so not counted as unaided evidence. | session 116 |
| 2026-10-15 | Developing → Developing | 15 Oct: writer as subject in 4 of 4 full sentences unprompted - 'Blake puts...', 'Blake make...', 'Browning is showing...', 'the word weakness shows...'. 0 'they' for a poet. One subject-verb slip ('Blake make'). | session 109 |
| 2026-10-14 | Developing → Developing | paper #9 Q11: 0/8, loss=not_attempted — the one developed-paragraph question on the paper was not started | session 105 |
| 2026-10-13 | Developing → Developing | 13 Oct: writer as subject in 4 of 4 full sentences she wrote, two poets, prompted only on the first ('make Browning the one doing it'): 'Browning makes the reader feel...', 'Blake blames...', 'Blake puts blood...', 'Blake shows that...'. 0 'they' for a poet (0 on 8 Oct also). One answer was a fragment with no subject ('to show the darkness in the king body'). | session 100 |
| 2026-10-08 | Developing → Developing | Session 86, 8 Oct: writer as subject in both written sentences that named one ('Browning is shows...', 'Browning is showing that...'), 2/2, and 0 'they' for the poet. In the paragraph's quotation sentence the effect clause has the character as subject ('this shows that the Duke could kill...'). 'them' used once for the visitor, not the poet. | standalone |
| 2026-09-28 | Developing → Developing | Writer as subject held in the one sentence she wrote unaided in the paper: 'The poet shows that the parent is sending the speaker away'. 1/1. | session 50 |
| 2026-09-24 | Developing → Developing | Writer as subject held in every written sentence ('Blake has used', 'Blake keeps repeating', 'Shelley makes'); one slip in a chat answer: 'In the poem London, they describe…'. | session 44 |
| 2026-09-22 | Developing → Developing | Writer as subject held throughout draft 5 and the exit sentence ('Shelley uses', 'Blake shows', 'Shelley's king makes the reader feel'); no evaluative sentence, no 'they', no 'I' (0 faults of those kinds in 1 draft). | session 39 |
| 2026-09-21 | Developing → Developing | No evaluative 'done a good job' sentence in any of four drafts after it was named as a countable fault before writing (0/4 drafts). New fault: 'they' for a single poet x2 and 'I looked / I saw' as subject in drafts 1-3; both cleared by draft 4 after being named. | session 35 |
| 2026-09-17 | Developing → Developing | Writer as subject held in the draft ('Blake wrote', 'Blake wants us to feel', 2/2). One evaluative sentence ('It seems like he's done a good job'), second instance (first 8 Sep). Named by the tutor; replaced with an effect-on-reader sentence after one narrowing. | session 30 |
| 2026-09-16 | Developing → Developing | Closing sentence unaided with the writer as subject: 'Shelley wants the reader to feel that Power always will crumble' (1/1). Second version slid to 'Shelley thinks' — writer still the subject, effect on the reader dropped. | session 28 |
| 2026-09-15 | Developing → Developing | Writer as subject held in both written sentences ('Shelley wants the reader...'). One slip of a different kind: 'William walks through a London street' - poet named as the speaker; corrected to 'the speaker' for events, 'Blake' for choices. | session 25 |
| 2026-09-11 | Developing → Developing | Writer as grammatical subject throughout both attempts, no slips into praising the writer or into character-as-subject. Third session running. | session 18 |
| 2026-09-08 | Developing → Developing | Writer as subject held through most of the session ('Shelley ends with...', 'Shelley presents...') but collapsed under fatigue at the close: 'Shelley did really good on showing the irony' — evaluative rather than analytical. | session 12 |
| 2026-09-07 | Not started → Developing | Wrote 'Shelley's used Ozymandias's pride as a flaw' and 'Shelley moves from the rubble to the inscription' — writer as grammatical subject, unprompted on both occasions in this session. | session 8 |
No marked question has been recorded against this topic yet.